OPTIMIZATION OF THE RAISED ROUTE BASED TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS ON THE CRITERION OF MINIMUM CO2 ATMOSPHERE EMISSIONS
Tofik Suleymanov, Shamsi Mamedov,
Azerbaijan National Aerospace Agency, Baku, Azerbaijan
DOI: 10.36724/2664-066X-2024-10-3-30-35
SYNCHROINFO JOURNAL. Volume 10, Number 3 (2024). P. 30-35.
Abstract
One of the main greenhouse gases is CO2, and motor transport is a significant source of this gas generation. The advent of electric cars does not fundamentally solve this problem, since the process of charging electric car batteries requires additional energy capacity, often operating on the principle of burning fossil fuels. Research into the issue of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere by motor transport is based on models based on the criterion of average speed and instantaneous emission. The problem of optimizing the vehicle movement mode on an inclined track by the criterion of the specific power of vehicle movement is considered. An integral criterion for optimizing vehicle movement on an inclined track is proposed in the form of vehicle specific power integral during movement. It is shown that both in the mode of limiting the distance traveled and without such a limitation, proposed integral criterion reaches a minimum when providing an inverse correspondence between movement speed and acceleration.
Keywords: air pollution, inclined track, optimization, specific power, movement speed, acceleration
References
[1] S.C. Davis, R.G. Boundy, “Transportation energy data book: edition 38.1,” Oak Ridge national laboratory. Tennessee. 2020.
[2] U. S. EPA. Inventory of U. S. Greenhouse gas emissions and sinks 1990-2019. 2021.
[3] U. S. EPA. Federal tax credits for all-electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles. 2020. https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/taxevb.shtml.
[4] J. Rissman. The future of electric vehicles in the U. S. 2017.
[5] EVAdoption. EV market share. 2017. http://evadoption.com/ev-market-share/.
[6] H. Achour, J.G. Carton, A.G. Olabi, “Estimating vehicle emissions from road transport, case study: Dublin city,” Appl. Energy. 2011. Vol. 88. No. 5, pp. 1957-1964.
[7] A. Yerramalla, “Vehicular emissions models using mobile 6.2 and field data,” 2007.
[8] M.J. Barth, R.R. Tadi, “Emissions comparison between truck and rail: case study of California I-40,” Transp. Res. Rec. 1996. Vol. 1520. No 1, pp. 44-52.
[9] J.L. Jimenez-Palacious, “Understanding and quantifying motor vehicle emissions with vehicle specific power and TILDAS remote sensing,” Massachusetts Inst. Technol. 1998.
[10] U. S. EPA. Motor vehicle emission simulator (MOVES), user guide for MOVES2014. 2014.
[11] H.C. Frey, A. Unal, J. Chen, S. Li, C. Xuan, “Methodology for developing modal emission rates for EPA’s multi-scale motor vehicle & equipment emission system,” Ann Arbor. Michigan US Environ. Prot. Agency. 2002.
[12] Y.V. Trofimenko, D.A. Deianov, V.I. Komkov and N.N. Fedotov, “Methodology for Predictive Estimation of Specific Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Traffic Flows,” 2022 Intelligent Technologies and Electronic Devices in Vehicle and Road Transport Complex (TIRVED), Moscow, Russian Federation, 2022, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/TIRVED56496.2022.9965512.
[13] R. Wu, D. Yang, H. Zhang and H. Xu, “Influence of Different Test Cycles on the CO2Emission Factor of Light Gasoline Vehicles,” 2023 7th International Conference on Power and Energy Engineering (ICPEE), Chengdu, China, 2023, pp. 250-254, doi: 10.1109/ICPEE60001.2023.10453898.